From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solorio-Acosta v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 17, 2005
1:05CV00319, 1:02CR152-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2005)

Opinion

1:05CV00319, 1:02CR152-2.

October 17, 2005


ORDER


On August 12, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Thereafter, and within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (docket no. 1) is denied, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Solorio-Acosta v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 17, 2005
1:05CV00319, 1:02CR152-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2005)
Case details for

Solorio-Acosta v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JESUS SOLORIO-ACOSTA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

1:05CV00319, 1:02CR152-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2005)