From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. United States Dist. Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 22, 2021
2:21-cv-00718-JAM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00718-JAM-JDP (HC)

12-22-2021

TIMOTHY SOLOMON, Petitioner, v. United States District Court, Respondent.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 21, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 21, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's amended petition, ECF No. 10, is dismissed without leave to amend for
failure to state a cognizable federal habeas claim; and
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Solomon v. United States Dist. Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 22, 2021
2:21-cv-00718-JAM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Solomon v. United States Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY SOLOMON, Petitioner, v. United States District Court, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00718-JAM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)