From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 21, 2012
481 F. App'x 342 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-35396 D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05114-RBL

09-21-2012

JULAINE SOLOMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; PIERCE COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Julaine Solomon appeals pro se from the district court's order denying her motion to reconsider in her action against the Social Security Administration and Pierce County. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's order denying a motion to reconsider. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Solomon's motion to reconsider because Solomon failed to demonstrate mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, or any other basis for relief from judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Sch. Dist. No. 1J, 5 F.3d at 1263.

To the extent that they seek relief, Solomon's pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Solomon v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 21, 2012
481 F. App'x 342 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Solomon v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:JULAINE SOLOMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 21, 2012

Citations

481 F. App'x 342 (9th Cir. 2012)