From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Schirmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
No. 2:08-cv-2544 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-2544 WBS JFM (PC)

01-31-2012

VINCENT J. SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT SCHIRMER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 23, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's October 5, 2011 motion to be transferred is denied.

____________________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Solomon v. Schirmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
No. 2:08-cv-2544 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Solomon v. Schirmer

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT J. SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT SCHIRMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-2544 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)