From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Justices' Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Feb 5, 1918
36 Cal.App. 152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2473.

February 5, 1918.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Grant Jackson, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Irl Solomon, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Carter Torchia, for Respondents.


This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to a complaint without leave to amend. There is on file a typewritten clerk's transcript setting forth the judgment-roll in the action, but no points and authorities in support of the appeal have ever been filed. As it is incumbent upon an appellant in any case to make an affirmative showing that the trial court has committed error in the case, before he can be relieved from the effects of the judgment appealed from, the judgment is affirmed. As it appears to us that the appeal is frivolous, the respondents, in addition to any costs recoverable by them because of the affirmance of the judgment, shall have and recover from the appellant the sum of fifty dollars as damages.


Summaries of

Solomon v. Justices' Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Feb 5, 1918
36 Cal.App. 152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
Case details for

Solomon v. Justices' Court

Case Details

Full title:IRL SOLOMON, Appellant, v. JUSTICES' COURT OF LOS ANGELES TOWNSHIP et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Feb 5, 1918

Citations

36 Cal.App. 152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
171 P. 817