Solomon v. Jacques

Full title: SHEILA SOLOMON v. BERNARD E. JACQUES, ET AL

Court: Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New London at Norwich

Date published: Jul 2, 1991

1991 Ct. Sup. 6257 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1991)

Opinion

No. 09 35 54

July 2, 1991

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LEUBA, J. 6258

The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted as to the defendant Bernard E. Jacques for the reason that the defenses offered by the pleadings either would be precluded by the parol evidence rule or are not legally valid.

Evidence that the contract between the parties included oral arrangements for partial payments would be precluded. Jarvis v. Cunliffe, 140 Conn. 297 (1953).

The "special defenses" simply are not legally sufficient, nor is the mortgage found to be unconscionable.

LEUBA, J.