From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Henry Modell Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1949
275 App. Div. 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

March 24, 1949.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.


We think that the complaint is sufficient. If upon a hearing it be determined that plaintiff is the party with whom defendant has contracted and that plaintiff is entitled to equitable aid in enforcement of defendant's contractual obligations, plaintiff may be accorded such relief as is proper in an injunction action of this character. The order directing a hearing to be held on plaintiff's motion for an injunction pendente lite and the order denying defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's application for such relief without setting it down for a hearing together with the order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency should be affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.

The date for the hearing to proceed shall be fixed in the order to be settled herein.

Glennon, J.P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The date for the hearing to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle orders on notice.


Summaries of

Solomon v. Henry Modell Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1949
275 App. Div. 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Solomon v. Henry Modell Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN SOLOMON, as President of Retail Wholesale Employees Union, Local…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)