From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Gold

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 20, 1955
2 Misc. 2d 397 (N.Y. App. Term 1955)

Opinion

October 20, 1955

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, VINCENT N. TRIMARCO, J.

Nathaniel Casden and Abraham Kirshon for appellant.

Charles Bennet for respondent.


The order appealed from, which denied the motion of intervenor-judgment-creditor to vacate the judgment entered on confession, is not appealable as of course (N.Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 154). Leave to appeal not having been obtained, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it ( Horwitz v. Kirkwood, 182 Misc. 638).

The appeal should be dismissed, with $10 costs.

EDER, SCHREIBER and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Solomon v. Gold

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 20, 1955
2 Misc. 2d 397 (N.Y. App. Term 1955)
Case details for

Solomon v. Gold

Case Details

Full title:JEROME J. SOLOMON, Respondent, v. MARTIN GOLD, Defendant, and AUSTRIAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1955

Citations

2 Misc. 2d 397 (N.Y. App. Term 1955)
146 N.Y.S.2d 450

Citing Cases

Lu-Ro Truck Car Renting Corp. v. Drezner

The order is not appealable without leave. ( Solomon v. Gold, 2 Misc.2d 397; N.Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 154.)…