From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Franco

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Mar 19, 1931
112 Cal.App. 679 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 7502.

March 19, 1931.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. F.B. Brown, Judge. Modified and affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

R.V. Bressani and John M. Burnett for Appellants.

Wayne R. Millington for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The respondent having in open court consented to remit all the judgment above the sum of $249, and it appearing to the court that there is nothing involved in the appeal except the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and it further appearing that the evidence is fully sufficient to support a judgment in that amount, the judgment is modified to read $249 and as so modified is affirmed, respondent to recover costs.


Summaries of

Solomon v. Franco

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Mar 19, 1931
112 Cal.App. 679 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

Solomon v. Franco

Case Details

Full title:V.C. SOLOMON, Respondent, v. JOE FRANCO et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Mar 19, 1931

Citations

112 Cal.App. 679 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
297 P. 121