Opinion
06cv0062, Electronically Filed.
April 4, 2008
Order of Court
AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2008, after careful consideration of defendant's Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Reissue Application of U.S. No. 6,585,326 B2 before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (doc. no. 183), plaintiff's response in opposition thereto (doc. no. 186), and defendant's reply thereto (doc. no. 189), this Court will exercise its discretion to stay this matter. See In Re: Lauglin Prods., Inc., 265 F. Supp.2d 525, 530 (E.D. Pa. 2003). The Court finds that a stay will promote judicial economy as well as the resources of the parties by streamlining the issues for trial and will avoid the potential result of having to litigate this case twice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion (doc. no. 183) is GRANTED, and this case will be STAYED and administratively closed.
SO ORDERED.