From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solla v. Natale

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50482 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

2005-719 S C.

Decided March 27, 2006.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, First District (James P. Flanagan, J.), entered on January 10, 2005. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,400 plus costs and disbursements.

Judgment affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., McCABE and LIPPMAN, JJ


In this small claims action, the credible evidence adduced upon the trial established that within a short period of time after defendant painted the exterior of plaintiff's house, the paint began to peel and appear blotchy. There is no basis to disturb the court's finding that this condition resulted from defendant's failure to remove all of the original paint prior to priming and applying the new coat. Since substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UDCA 1804, 1807), the judgment should be affirmed.

Rudolph, P.J., McCabe and Lippman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Solla v. Natale

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50482 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

Solla v. Natale

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP SOLLA, Respondent, v. JEFFREY NATALE D/B/A SELECT INTERIOR…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 2006

Citations

2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50482 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
816 N.Y.S.2d 701