From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solis v. 666 Fifth Ave. Assocs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2021
20 CIVIL 5105 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 5105 (AKH)

12-20-2021

ANTHONY SOLIS, Plaintiff, v. 666 FIFTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 20, 2021, conclude that the unambiguous language of the Settlement Agreement extends to Plaintiffs claims against Defendant 666 Fifth. The plain language of the Settlement Agreement is controlling, and Plaintiff may not reach outside the document to contest the parties' intent. Even accepting the truth of the plausible, well-pleaded allegations of the Complaint, all of plaintiff s claims are barred by the Settlement Agreement and this case is dismissed as moot. Because my findings as to the enforceability of the Settlement Agreement are dispositive, I do not address Defendant's arguments that Defendant was not served with sufficient process or that Plaintiffs EEOC Right to Sue letter is inadequate. Judgment is entered for the Defendant.


Summaries of

Solis v. 666 Fifth Ave. Assocs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2021
20 CIVIL 5105 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Solis v. 666 Fifth Ave. Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SOLIS, Plaintiff, v. 666 FIFTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 5105 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021)

Citing Cases

Next Generation Tech. v. Jaddou

Having determined it does not have subject matter jurisdiction, however, the Court does not separately…