From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SOLE v. KNEALE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 28, 1994
629 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 93-734, 93-1104.

December 28, 1993. Rehearing Denied January 28, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Norman S. Gerstein, J.

Mariano Sole, and Andrea E. Newman, Miami, for appellants.

Malcolm Lewis Kneale, in pro. per.

Before NESBITT, COPE and LEVY, JJ.


Appellants Sole and Pintado appeal a final order directing them to pay special master's fees. We reverse.

There is no substantive basis for holding the attorney of record personally liable for costs in the absence of authorization by a contract or statute, Israel v. Lee, 470 So.2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), or other than as a sanction for wrongdoing. Harrison v. State, 519 So.2d 72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). See 7A C.J.S. Attorney Client, § 138 (1980) (In the absence of misconduct or of a statute or rule of court providing otherwise, an attorney is not liable for the costs of suit unless he has agreed to become liable). Because none of these circumstances were present, we reverse.


Summaries of

SOLE v. KNEALE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 28, 1994
629 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

SOLE v. KNEALE

Case Details

Full title:MARIANO SOLE, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MALCOLM LEWIS KNEALE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 28, 1994

Citations

629 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Novartis Phars. Corp. v. Carnoto

This cause was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus or certiorari, challenging one circuit court order…

Bauer v. Hardy

See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.720(g) ("Where appropriate, each party shall pay a proportionate share of the total…