From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soldridge v. Ransom

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 2022
1:21-cv-01594 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01594

03-28-2022

BARRY SOLDRIDGE, JR., Plaintiff v. KEVIN RANSOM, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

AND NOW, on this 28th day of March 2022, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim (Doc. No. 12) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1);

2. Plaintiff is DENIED any further leave to amend this Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim;

3. The Court DECLINES to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state-law claim for negligence (Doc. No. 12); and

4. The second amended complaint (Doc. No. 12) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. 1


Summaries of

Soldridge v. Ransom

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 2022
1:21-cv-01594 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Soldridge v. Ransom

Case Details

Full title:BARRY SOLDRIDGE, JR., Plaintiff v. KEVIN RANSOM, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 28, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01594 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2022)