From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soldridge v. Ransom

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 3, 2022
1:21-cv-01594 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01594

02-03-2022

BARRY SOLDRIDGE, JR., Plaintiff v. KEVIN RANSOM, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Yvette Kane, District Judge

AND NOW, on this 3rd day of February 2022, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. No. 9) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1);

2. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kevin Ransom are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Kevin Ransom as a defendant in this case;

3. Plaintiff is, however, granted leave to file a second amended complaint with respect to the Eighth Amendment claims that he asserted against Defendant Carl Kuren-namely, a conditions of confinement claim and a failure to protect claim;

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form;

5. Plaintiff shall title that complaint form “Second Amended Complaint” and shall include the docket number for this case, 1:21-cv-01594; and

6. In the event that Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Soldridge v. Ransom

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 3, 2022
1:21-cv-01594 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Soldridge v. Ransom

Case Details

Full title:BARRY SOLDRIDGE, JR., Plaintiff v. KEVIN RANSOM, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 3, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01594 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2022)