From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solar v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 6, 2019
264 So. 3d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 4D18-1714

02-06-2019

Jose Luis GARCIA SOLAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jose Luis Garcia Solar, Okeechobee, pro se. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Jose Luis Garcia Solar, Okeechobee, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam. Affirmed .

Gerber, C.J., and Taylor, J., concur.

Forst, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion.

Forst, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I respectfully dissent in part. Appellant was not afforded an evidentiary hearing on any of the claims raised in his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. I agree with the majority in finding no error in the trial court summarily denying six of the seven claims. However, I would remand for an evidentiary hearing with respect to Appellant's contention that counsel's failure to move to exclude incriminating evidence of items found in the vehicle in which Appellant was stopped constituted reversible ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant "stated a legally sufficient claim for relief, and the record before this court does not conclusively refute the claim." Harris v. State , 74 So.3d 567, 568 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).


Summaries of

Solar v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 6, 2019
264 So. 3d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Solar v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LUIS GARCIA SOLAR, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 6, 2019

Citations

264 So. 3d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)