From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solano v. Cnty. Comm'rs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 5, 2016
3:16-cv-00075-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2016)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00075-RCJ-VPC

07-05-2016

RAY SOLANO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Ray Solano filed a Complaint attached to an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff alleges that he broke a tooth on a foreign object in the food at Washoe County Detention Center, and that the staff ignored his requests for medical assistance in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The Magistrate Judge denied the application because it was incomplete, ordering Plaintiff to "file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form with complete financial attachments in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)," or to pay the filing fee, within thirty days on pain of dismissal. Plaintiff filed the previously missing financial certificates with his new application, but the application itself is incomplete. Specifically, page two of the application is missing. /// /// ///

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 4) is DENIED, and the case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 5th day of July, 2016.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Solano v. Cnty. Comm'rs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 5, 2016
3:16-cv-00075-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Solano v. Cnty. Comm'rs

Case Details

Full title:RAY SOLANO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 5, 2016

Citations

3:16-cv-00075-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2016)