From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sokolowski v. Nobile

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 8, 1948
60 A.2d 174 (Conn. 1948)

Opinion

Writs of error from city courts in summary process actions are returnable to the Supreme Court of Errors.

Argued June 2, 1948

Decided June 8, 1948

WRIT of error to the Superior Court in Middlesex County, whence it was transferred to the Court of Common Pleas in Middlesex County, claiming that a judgment of the City Court of Middletown (Kelly, J.) in an action of summary process in favor of the defendant in error (plaintiff in the City Court) be set aside; the court, McNiff, J., granted the defendant in error's motion to erase, from which action the plaintiff in error appealed to this court. No error.

George G. Whitehead, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Thomas C. Cambria, for the appellee (defendant).


This case differs in no material respect from the preceding case, Walling v. Robertine. That case states the rule to be: "Writs of error from city courts are returnable to the Supreme Court of Errors."

The plaintiff makes two additional claims. General Statutes, Sup. 1947, 1418i, does not affect the jurisdiction of writs of error of the specific courts named in 1667c and 1665c of the 1935 Cumulative Supplement. The term "municipal courts" is not used in the latter sections. General Statutes, 5704, authorizing the bringing of writs of error in which errors in matters of fact and in matters of law are joined to the Superior Court, has been repealed. Cum. Sup. 1935, 1666c.


Summaries of

Sokolowski v. Nobile

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 8, 1948
60 A.2d 174 (Conn. 1948)
Case details for

Sokolowski v. Nobile

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN SOKOLOWSKI v. EMELIA NOBILE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 8, 1948

Citations

60 A.2d 174 (Conn. 1948)
60 A.2d 174

Citing Cases

Cutting v. Yudkin

Cum. Sup. 1935, 1665c (Rev. 1949, 8017). All municipal courts now have jurisdiction of summary process…