From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sokoli v. Quality Carton, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 23, 2001
286 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

August 23, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered September 21, 2000, which, in an action for wrongful death and personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, denied defendant-appellant's motion to renew its prior motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Robin Mary Heaney, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Roger P. McTiernan, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Friedman, JJ.


The motion, which sought consideration of new evidence consisting of corroborating or opining on a police accident report and police photographs of the accident and an autopsy report of plaintiffs' decedent, was properly denied for lack of a reasonable justification for the failure to present such evidence on the prior motion (CPLR 2221[e][3]). We would also note that the new evidence does not in any event dispel the issues of fact, which turn largely on credibility.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Sokoli v. Quality Carton, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 23, 2001
286 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Sokoli v. Quality Carton, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SABRIJE SOKOLI, ETC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. QUALITY CARTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 23, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 888

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Glob. Home Improvements, Inc.

Nor do the affidavits by defendant's project manager and foreman constitute new facts; they are based on…

Lang v. Carroll

As for example, we cannot say that the photographs and a videotape submitted with the motions are dispositive…