From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sokol v. Daycock

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 19, 2011
Motion No: 2010-10376 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Motion No: 2010-10376 Index No. 08-6271 M124729

08-19-2011

Howard Sokol, also known as Howard Suckle, respondent, v. Suzanne Daycock, appellant, et al., defendants.


, J.P.

ANITA R. FLORIO

PLUMMER E. LOTT

JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 12, 2010.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until September 19, 2011, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,

ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.

DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Sokol v. Daycock

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 19, 2011
Motion No: 2010-10376 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Sokol v. Daycock

Case Details

Full title:Howard Sokol, also known as Howard Suckle, respondent, v. Suzanne Daycock…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 19, 2011

Citations

Motion No: 2010-10376 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 19, 2011)