Opinion
Argued February 9, 1934 —
Decided April 12, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 17.
For the respondent, Martin P. O'Connor.
For the appellant, McDermott, Enright Carpenter.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, DILL, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.