From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sok v. Eischen

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 22, 2022
22-cr-458 (ECT/LIB) (D. Minn. Nov. 22, 2022)

Opinion

22-cr-458 (ECT/LIB)

11-22-2022

Phoumara Todd Sok, Plaintiff, v. B. Eischen, FPC-Duluth Warden, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ERIC C. TOSTRUD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation on October 26, 2022. ECF No. 15. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 15] is ACCEPTED;

2. Petitioner Phoumara Todd Sok's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and

3. The present action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Sok v. Eischen

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 22, 2022
22-cr-458 (ECT/LIB) (D. Minn. Nov. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Sok v. Eischen

Case Details

Full title:Phoumara Todd Sok, Plaintiff, v. B. Eischen, FPC-Duluth Warden, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

22-cr-458 (ECT/LIB) (D. Minn. Nov. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

Walton v. Fikes

18 U.S.C.A. § 3584 (c); see also Sok v. Eischen, No. 22-CV-458 (ECT/LIB), 2022 WL 17156797, at *1 (D. Minn.…

Vendrell-Santiago v. Rivers

(“BOP was required to aggregate [the] [p]etitioner's multiple sentences under § 3584(c) and correctly…