From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sohl v. Winkler

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jul 22, 1994
877 P.2d 1323 (Ariz. 1994)

Opinion

No. CV-94-0297-PR.

July 22, 1994.

Allan K. Polley, Cochise County Atty., Vincent J. Festa, Bisbee, for State.

Benna R. Troup, Cochise Public Defender, Keven E. Kane, Bisbee, for petitioner.


ORDER

This is the time set for oral argument on petitioner's application for a stay. Telephonic oral argument is had with Kevin E. Kane participating for petitioner, and Vincent J. Festa participating for the state before the duty justice. Following oral argument, the duty justice took the matter under advisement. LATER:

IT IS ORDERED denying petitioner's application for a stay.

It appearing to the Court that the denial of the application for a stay moots the petition for review,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing the petition for review. Of course, any order herein is without prejudice to any rights the petitioner may have hereafter either in the trial court or on appeal following trial court proceedings.

/s/ James Moeller JAMES MOELLER Vice Chief Justice


Summaries of

Sohl v. Winkler

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jul 22, 1994
877 P.2d 1323 (Ariz. 1994)
Case details for

Sohl v. Winkler

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey Scott SOHL, Petitioner, v. Honorable Richard A. WINKLER, Judge…

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Jul 22, 1994

Citations

877 P.2d 1323 (Ariz. 1994)
179 Ariz. 267