From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sogy v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 25, 2011
444 F. App'x 999 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-70847.

Submitted July 12, 2011.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

July 25, 2011.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A098-372-409.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Anoop Sogy, a native of the Philippines and a citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Sogy's motion to reopen where Sogy's claims could have been raised in his prior proceedings before the agency. See Mondragon v. INS, 625 F.2d 270, 272 (9th Cir. 1980); see also Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (BIA's denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is "arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law").

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Sogy v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 25, 2011
444 F. App'x 999 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Sogy v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:ANOOP SOGY, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 25, 2011

Citations

444 F. App'x 999 (9th Cir. 2011)