From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soeun v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 12, 2008
1:08-cv-00195-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2008)

Opinion

1:08-cv-00195-DLB (HC).

May 12, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCUMENT #19) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 5, 2008, petitioner filed a motion to extend time to reply to Respondent's motion to dismiss. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to reply to Respondent's motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Soeun v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 12, 2008
1:08-cv-00195-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Soeun v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:SAL SOEUN, Petitioner, v. R.A. HOREL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 12, 2008

Citations

1:08-cv-00195-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2008)