Opinion
570707/09.
Decided on September 17, 2010.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered December 9, 2008, which, upon a prior order granting summary judgment, awarded plaintiff damages in the principal sum of $878.67.
Judgment (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered December 9, 2008, affirmed, without costs.
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ.
Plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidentiary proof that the prescribed statutory billing form had been mailed and received, and that payment of no-fault benefits was overdue ( see New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. , 12 AD3d 429 , lv denied 4 NY3d 705). We note in this connection that the affidavit of plaintiff's employee attesting to plaintiff's standard office mailing procedures created a presumption of mailing of the subject claim, and, in any event, defendant acknowledged receipt of the claim ( see Fair Price Med. Supply Inc. v St. Paul Travelers Ins. Co. , 16 Misc 3d 8 ). In opposition, defendant, which bore the burden of proving its lack of coverage defense ( see Matter of MVAIC v Interboro Med. Care Diagnostic, PC , 73 AD3d 667 ), failed to raise a triable issue on this point, since it offered no competent evidence showing that the plaintiff's assignor's loss arose from the use or operation of an uninsured motor vehicle ( see Insurance Law § 5221[b]).
We reject defendant's contention that, pursuant to Insurance Law § 5225, it is exempt from paying plaintiff "statutory interest, statutory attorneys' fees and costs," since the plain language of that statute only exempts defendant from paying certain "taxes and fees" imposed by state and local governments. Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, are without merit.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.