From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Socorro v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 27, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1313 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1313 LKK GGH P.

November 27, 2007


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed August 3, 2007, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On September 17, 2007, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days to amend the complaint. That period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Socorro v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 27, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1313 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Socorro v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO SOCORRO, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 27, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1313 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2007)