From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Socorro v. Orleans Levee Board

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 9, 1990
568 So. 2d 1068 (La. 1990)

Summary

In Socorro, the meaning of "garde" was addressed and this Court held that "garde" may rest with one who has supervision and control of the thing, one who need not be the owner.

Summary of this case from Coleman v. Otis Elevator Co.

Opinion

No. 90-C-1633.

November 9, 1990.

In re Socorro, Franz; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CA-0212; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. "G", No. 84-17067.


Granted.


Summaries of

Socorro v. Orleans Levee Board

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 9, 1990
568 So. 2d 1068 (La. 1990)

In Socorro, the meaning of "garde" was addressed and this Court held that "garde" may rest with one who has supervision and control of the thing, one who need not be the owner.

Summary of this case from Coleman v. Otis Elevator Co.
Case details for

Socorro v. Orleans Levee Board

Case Details

Full title:FRANZ SOCORRO v. ORLEANS LEVEE BOARD AND/OR BOARD OF LEVEE COMMISSIONERS…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Nov 9, 1990

Citations

568 So. 2d 1068 (La. 1990)

Citing Cases

Coleman v. Otis Elevator Co.

This Court stated in Brown that the record "does not establish that OTIS had exclusive custody and control of…