From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sobol v. K Mart Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 2000
275 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

September 29, 2000.

Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, O'Donnell, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., HAYES, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Defendants failed to establish as a matter of law that plaintiff was injured in the course of performing routine maintenance rather than repairing the sign ( see, Smith v. Shell Oil Co., 85 N.Y.2d 1000, 1002; Izrailev v. Ficarra Furniture of Long Is., 70 N.Y.2d 813, 815).


Summaries of

Sobol v. K Mart Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 2000
275 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Sobol v. K Mart Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. SOBOL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. K MART CORPORATION, B W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 29, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 193