From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sobol v. Chelsea Hotel Corporation

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 11, 1948
61 A.2d 503 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Argued September 27, 1948 —

Decided October 11, 1948.

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Maurice Y. Cole argued the cause for the defendant-respondent ( Messrs. Cole Cole, attorneys).


This is an appeal from an order of the former Supreme Court at the Atlantic County Circuit, opening an interlocutory judgment entered against the defendant by default, and permitting it to appear and defend upon terms.

An appeal, however, lies only from a final judgment. The order thus sought to be reviewed does not fall within the category of a final judgment and is, therefore, not appealable. R.S. 2:27-349. Vide Farmland Dairies v. Van Tol, 132 N.J.L. 298 , aff'd 133 Id. 313; Matthews v. Public Servive Interstate, etc., Co., 130 Id. 495; Chavers v. McCall, 127 Id. 595 ; Kople v. Zalon, 122 Id. 422; Jacquin v. Appelgate, 128 Id. 598; Gaffney v. Illingsworth, 90 Id. 490.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed, with costs.

For dismissal of appeal: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, and ACKERSON — 7.

Opposed: None.


Summaries of

Sobol v. Chelsea Hotel Corporation

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 11, 1948
61 A.2d 503 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Sobol v. Chelsea Hotel Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HELEN SOBOL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHELSEA HOTEL CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 11, 1948

Citations

61 A.2d 503 (N.J. 1948)
61 A.2d 503

Citing Cases

Zar v. Zar

Equally certain it is that the order dislodging the judgment nisi to permit the reinstatement of the…

Scott v. Stewart

Although the point is not raised by the plaintiff, the appeal now before us is from an interlocutory order of…