From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sobel v. Sobel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 5, 2004
873 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 4D03-1619.

Opinion filed May 5, 2004.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Edward A. Garrison, Judge, L.T. Case No. CD 2001-9168 FC.

Margherita Downey, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Christopher Chopin, and Susan G. Chopin of Chopin, Chopin Chopin, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The former wife appeals a contempt order for failure to pay child support and an attorney's fees judgment. Among other issues, she argues that the trial court erred in ordering attorney's fees when the former husband failed to produce a financial affidavit. We affirm the contempt order, but agree that the attorney's fees judgment should be reversed.

The former husband filed a motion for contempt based on the former wife's failure to make child support payments. He also requested that the court award him attorney's fees. The former wife filed a Request to Produce Current Financial Affidavit and Support Ledger Sheet. At the hearing on the motion for attorney's fees, the former wife advised the court that she had not received the required financial affidavit from the former husband Nevertheless, the trial court awarded attorney's fees to the former husband

"Any party in an enforcement or contempt proceeding may serve upon any other party a written request to file and serve a financial affidavit if the other party's financial circumstances are relevant in the proceeding." Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.287. Further, "[b]"ecause the contempt proceedings arose in the context of a dissolution involving custody, the trial court must determine need and ability to pay before awarding attorney's fees." Keitel v. Keitel, 716 So.2d 842, 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Without requiring the former husband to provide the requested financial affidavit, neither the former wife nor the trial court had the requisite information for determining the issue of attorney's fees. We therefore reverse the attorney's fees judgment. We find no error in the other issues raised.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

POLEN, MAY, JJ., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN, Associate Judge, concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Sobel v. Sobel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 5, 2004
873 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Sobel v. Sobel

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE SOBEL, Appellant, v. TERRY D. SOBEL, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 5, 2004

Citations

873 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Brennan v. Brennan

Thus, she did not adequately demonstrate her need for attorney's fees. Sobel v. Sobel, 873 So.2d 449 (Fla.…

Brennan v. Brennan

However, she failed to testify as to the assets she currently possessed, her current monthly income, or any…