From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sobel v. Bess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 1972
39 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

May 30, 1972


Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 15, 1971, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Pursuant to an interlocutory decree defendants were required, inter alia, to render certain accounts to plaintiff. Defendants have rendered their accounts and plaintiff has filed his objections. Plaintiff has not yet moved for a hearing on his objections. Defendants moved to take the deposition of plaintiff's attorney and two accountants hired by him who had examined defendants' books. Special Term granted the motion, ordered the examination to take place before a referee and empowered the referee to hear and determine all objections raised at the examination, including those based upon privilege. In our opinion it was a proper exercise of Special Term's discretion to grant the motion (CPLR 3101, subd. [a], par. [4]; Matter of Macku, 29 A.D.2d 539; Romeo v. Russo, 31 A.D.2d 935). We express no opinion on matters of asserted privilege, however. Those issues are for the referee to hear and determine in the first instance. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sobel v. Bess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 1972
39 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Sobel v. Bess

Case Details

Full title:JACK SOBEL, as Surviving General Partner of Great River Country Club…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 30, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Rupert v. Sellers

At Special Term these witnesses opposed the notice to examine them, but they have not appealed from the order…

Matter of Rothko

It is the contention of the Attorney-General that he is acting in this proceeding solely as an attorney at…