Sobel v. Bess

1 Citing case

  1. HUGHES SALARIED RETIREES v. ADM'R OF HUGHES

    72 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 1994)

    Thus, Morris offers no authority for the imposition of a disclosure duty on the Plan Administrator because the Hughes retirement plan is not a voting trust and Plan participants have no votes to be solicited. In Sobel v. Bess, 373 N.Y.S.2d 513 (N Y App. Div. 1975), the court ordered the defendant, as receiver of certain property from a dissolved partnership, to hold the property in trust and to furnish a list of trust beneficiaries to the plaintiff, as a beneficiary and former general partner. However, the order was reversed on other grounds.