From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2022
2:22-CV-1140-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-1140-KJM-DMC-P

10-03-2022

JACOB CLINTON SNYDER, Petitioner, v. SAHSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a pre-trial detainee proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 10. Petitioner has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that Petitioner is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 10, is granted.


Summaries of

Snyder v. Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 3, 2022
2:22-CV-1140-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Snyder v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:JACOB CLINTON SNYDER, Petitioner, v. SAHSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-1140-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)