From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Oct 5, 2010
Cause No. C10-5286RSL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Cause No. C10-5286RSL.

October 5, 2010


ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


This matter comes before the Court on "Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment." Dkt. # 27. Plaintiff has not opposed defendants' request for judgment, and the Court considers such a failure to be "an admission that the motion has merit." Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The motion of defendants State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources, Peter Goldmark, Melissa Montgomery, Washington State Attorney General's Office, Joseph Panesko, Terence A. Pruit, Robert M. McKenna, Russell W. Hartman, Robert C. Krabill, and Craddock D. Verser is therefore GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against the State defendants are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Dated this 5th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Snyder v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Oct 5, 2010
Cause No. C10-5286RSL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Snyder v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN N. SNYDER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Oct 5, 2010

Citations

Cause No. C10-5286RSL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 5, 2010)