From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Riverside Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 21, 2018
Case No. ED CV 15-817-DSF (SP) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 15-817-DSF (SP)

05-21-2018

JOSHUA SNYDER, Plaintiff, v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 58) is granted; (2) plaintiff's request for leave to file a Sur-Reply (docket no. 82) is denied; (3) plaintiff's request for additional discovery, which was effectively made under Rule 56(d) (not Rule 56(f) as stated in the Report) is denied; (4) plaintiff's request to add defendants to this action is denied as futile; (5) plaintiff's motion to appoint a neutral medical expert and plumbing expert witness (docket no. 81) is denied as moot; and (6) Judgment will be entered dismissing the Complaint and this action with prejudice. DATED: 5/21/18

/s/_________

HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Snyder v. Riverside Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 21, 2018
Case No. ED CV 15-817-DSF (SP) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Snyder v. Riverside Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA SNYDER, Plaintiff, v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 21, 2018

Citations

Case No. ED CV 15-817-DSF (SP) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2018)