From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Plummer

Supreme Court of California
Jan 11, 1917
174 Cal. 204 (Cal. 1917)

Opinion

Sac. No. 2630.

January 11, 1917.

This was an application, originally made in the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District, for a Writ of Certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County vacating a judgment that had been entered in the case of Snyder v. Miller et al., and recalling an execution that had issued thereon. The basis for the application for the writ was that the motion to vacate the judgment was made by the judgment debtor more than thirty months after the judgment had been made and entered. The District Court of Appeal denied the writ, and the petitioner then applied to the Supreme Court for a hearing of the application by that court. In denying the hearing the Supreme Court rendered the following opinion.

A.H. Carpenter, for Petitioner.


In denying the petition for a hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, we deem it proper to say that the denial is made solely for the reason that the order of the superior court sought to be reviewed is a special order made after final judgment, and is therefore one from which an appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963.) This being so, certiorari will not lie. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1068.)


Summaries of

Snyder v. Plummer

Supreme Court of California
Jan 11, 1917
174 Cal. 204 (Cal. 1917)
Case details for

Snyder v. Plummer

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SNYDER, Petitioner, v. J. A. PLUMMER, as Judge of the Superior…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 11, 1917

Citations

174 Cal. 204 (Cal. 1917)
162 P. 1040

Citing Cases

McKeever v. Superior Court

It is also claimed that plaintiff should have appealed from the order if she was dissatisfied with the same,…

Lovret v. Seyfarth

These orders of vacation are all special orders made after the final judgment confirming the award and made…