From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1898
35 App. Div. 97 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

November Term, 1898.

John A. Delehanty, for the appellants, John Mack and others.

James J. Farren, for the appellant, John F. Calder.

Dewitt C. Moore, for the respondent.


Upon the papers before us it is quite clear that the main issue upon the facts is whether or not the orders given by the plaintiff were executed. The witnesses upon that subject are mainly, if not entirely, in the county of Albany. The books and papers of the corporation are also there and they may be material upon the subject referred to. It seems to us that the convenience of witnesses requires the trial to be in Albany county, and, therefore, the motion of the defendant should have been granted.

All concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide the event.


Summaries of

Snyder v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1898
35 App. Div. 97 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

Snyder v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:PAUL SNYDER, Respondent, v . JOHN MACK and Others, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1898

Citations

35 App. Div. 97 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
54 N.Y.S. 534

Citing Cases

Weidenfeld v. McClure

It may be that the testimony of many of these members may be held cumulative or unnecessary upon the trial,…