Snyder v. Heidelberger

3 Citing cases

  1. Snyder v. Heidelberger

    2011 IL 111052 (Ill. 2011)   Cited 140 times
    In Snyder, however, the court held that the provision did not apply, because the injury—the failure to realize that the property was in a land trust when the attorney prepared a quitclaim deed to it—occurred when the deed was delivered and recorded, because it became effective at that time.

    A divided appellate court reversed and remanded. 403 Ill. App. 3d 974. BACKGROUND

  2. Snyder v. Heidelberger

    942 N.E.2d 462 (Ill. 2010)

    November 24, 2010. Appeal from the 403 Ill. App. 3d 974. Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal Allowed.

  3. Reliable Fire Equipment Company v. Arredondo

    405 Ill. App. 3d 708 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010)   Cited 9 times
    Finding that plaintiff could not recover lost profits because it failed to prove that lost profits were calculable with reasonable certainty

    Nevertheless, I observe that this is not the first time this court has inexplicably placed a minority view in a "majority" opinion. In another recent case, Snyder v. Heidelberger, 403 Ill. App. 3d 974 (2010), Justice McLaren wrote the "majority" opinion even though, as I explained in my dissent, Justice Jorgensen's special concurrence actually represented the majority view of the court. In my dissent, I questioned the illogical structure of the opinion, and I predicted that it would cause undue confusion for bench and bar.