From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Floyd

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 1, 2022
2:22-CV-10472 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-10472

04-01-2022

VAN ORION SNYDER, Petitioner, v. MICHELLE FLOYD, Respondent,


OPINION AND DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ECF NO. 4

HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Van Orion Snyder, "Petitioner", incarcerated at the Cooper Street Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his convictions for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520b, and being a third felony habitual offender, Mich. Comp. Laws § 769.11. Petitioner filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 4. For the reasons stated below, the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. There is no constitutional right to counsel in habeas proceedings. Cobas v. Burgess, 306 F.3d 441, 4446th Cir. 2002. The decision to appoint counsel for a federal habeas petitioner is within the discretion of the court and is required only where the interests of justice or due process so require. Mira v. Marshall, 806 F.2d 636, 6386th Cir. 1986. The Court determines that the interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel at this time.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 4) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Snyder v. Floyd

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 1, 2022
2:22-CV-10472 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Snyder v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:VAN ORION SNYDER, Petitioner, v. MICHELLE FLOYD, Respondent,

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 1, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-10472 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 1, 2022)