From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Fancher

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Apr 26, 1932
7 F. Supp. 597 (W.D.N.Y. 1932)

Opinion

No. 736-A.

April 26, 1932.

Joseph H. Gintzler, of Buffalo, N.Y., for plaintiff.

Orla E. Black, of Salamanca, N.Y., for defendants Fancher and Mills, executors, and Musette B. Fancher, individually.

Killeen Sweeney, of Buffalo, N.Y., for defendant Mills, individually.


Defendants move to dismiss the complaint on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction. The ground of jurisdiction must be shown in the complaint. Butte Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co., 249 U.S. 12, 39 S. Ct. 231, 63 L. Ed. 447. The District Court has only such jurisdiction as is given by statute. Cunard Steamship Company v. Smith (C.C.A.) 255 F. 846, 848; section 24 Jud. Code ( 28 USCA § 41). The complaint contains no allegation of diversity of citizenship or that the case arises under the Constitution or laws of the United States or treaties. It appears that the complaint is in contract between citizens. The plaintiff is alleged to be a full-blooded Indian. Such fact does not give jurisdiction to this court. Deere v. St. Lawrence River Power Company (C.C.A.) 32 F.2d 550, and cases cited. Presumably plaintiff is a citizen. Act Cong. June 2, 1924 (8 USCA § 3). Whether he was, makes no difference here. He has no right other than any citizen to litigate contractual obligations in this court. U.S. v. Seneca Nation of New York Indians (D.C.) 274 F. 946.

This action could be maintained only in the event of diversity of citizenship, and such is not shown in the pleading.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Snyder v. Fancher

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Apr 26, 1932
7 F. Supp. 597 (W.D.N.Y. 1932)
Case details for

Snyder v. Fancher

Case Details

Full title:SNYDER v. FANCHER et al

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1932

Citations

7 F. Supp. 597 (W.D.N.Y. 1932)

Citing Cases

Kennedy v. Public Works Administration

This claim is based upon the provisions of Section 41, subdivision (24), Title 28 U.S.C.A., and Section 345,…

Richardson v. Malone

In Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe of Southern Ute Reservation, 249 F.2d 915, 917 (10th Cir. 1957), the Court…