He was bound to use his senses in listening and looking, and using reasonable care to observe the warning signs along the way, pointing out that he was about to cross railroad tracks. B. O.R.R. Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66, 48 S. Ct. 24, 72 L. Ed. 167, 56 A.L.R. 645; Railroad Co. v. Houston, 95 U.S. 697, 24 L. Ed. 542; Wabash Ry. Co. v. Zayac (C.C.A.) 30 F.2d 764; Snyder v. Chicago, etc., Ry. Co. (C.C.A.) 29 F.2d 910; Hickey v. Missouri Pac. R.R. Corp. (C.C.A.) 8 F.2d 128. The rule of due care for the traveler on the highway, approaching a railroad crossing, either on foot or in an automobile, requires him to stop, look, and listen, if he has knowledge that he is about to cross railroad tracks. B. O.R. Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66, 48 S. Ct. 24, 72 L. Ed. 167, 56 A.L.R. 645. The deceased had fair warning, if he exercised ordinary care, that he was about to cross a track.
A driver approaching a railroad track must look for danger. B. O.R.R. Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66. Snyder v. C., B. Q.R. Co. (C.C.A. 8) 29 F.2d 910. Cummins v. Erie R. Co. (C.C.A. 6) 83 F.2d 816.
There is not sufficient basis in the evidence to support the claim of reckless or wanton misconduct. Brown v. Chicago N.W. Ry Co., 109 Wis. 384, 85 N.W. 271, 273; Cleveland, C., C. St. L. Ry. Co. v. Miller, 149 Ind. 490, 49 N.E. 445, 451; Matta v. Chicago W. M. Ry. Co., 69 Mich. 109, 37 N.W. 54, 55; Payne v. Smitherman, 206 Ala. 591, 91 So. 575, 576; Georgia Pacific Ry. Co. v. Lee, 92 Ala. 262, 9 So. 230, 234; Evans v. Illinois Central R. Co., 289 Mo. 493, 233 S.W. 397, 400; Jacobs v. Atchison, T. S. F. Ry. Co., 97 Kan. 247, 154 P. 1023, 1026; Mollica v. Michigan Central R. Co., 170 Mich. 96, 135 N.W. 927, 930; Snyder v. Chicago, B. Q. R. Co., 29 F.2d 910, 912; Pond v. Connecticut Co., 95 Conn. 437, 440, 111 A. 621.