From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snulligan v. Selector

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois
Jan 23, 2004
No. 03 C 9417 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 23, 2004)

Opinion

No. 03 C 9417

January 23, 2004


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Like the Energizer Bunny, pro se plaintiff Kevin Snulligan keeps going and going. In his just-received "Motion To Amend" he seeks to add an entire group of new defendants to this action, which this Court's January 15, 2004 memorandum order ("Order") has already dismissed. None of those proposed defendants would place this case in a different posture from the one that, as the Order explained, called for dismissal. Hence the Motion To Amend is denied.


Summaries of

Snulligan v. Selector

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois
Jan 23, 2004
No. 03 C 9417 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 23, 2004)
Case details for

Snulligan v. Selector

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN SNULLIGAN #10587-424, Plaintiff v. SELECTOR ATTORNEY GENERAL, etc.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois

Date published: Jan 23, 2004

Citations

No. 03 C 9417 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 23, 2004)