From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snowden v. Prada

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 9, 2013
CV 12-1466 DSF(JC) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)

Opinion

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative Second Amended Complaint, all documents submitted in connection with the Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") filed by defendants Correctional Sergeant Prada, and Correctional Officers Arredondo, Murphy, and Kelly ("Moving Defendants"), and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"). The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) the Motion to Dismiss is granted to the extent it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claims against the Moving Defendants based upon plaintiff's failure properly to exhaust available administrative remedies; (2) the Second Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed without prejudice as against all defendants for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation; and (3) that Judgment be entered accordingly.

          IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the accompanying Judgment, and the Report and Recommendation on plaintiff and counsel for defendants.


         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Snowden v. Prada

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 9, 2013
CV 12-1466 DSF(JC) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Snowden v. Prada

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS LEE SNOWDEN, III, Plaintiff, v. SGT. PRADA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 9, 2013

Citations

CV 12-1466 DSF(JC) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)