From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snowden v. Eater

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 5, 2007
214 F. App'x 624 (8th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-2664.

Submitted: February 2, 2007.

Filed: February 5, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

Samuel Snowden, Delight, AR, pro se.

Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Samuel Snowden appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of his employment-discrimination action. Having conducted de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Snowden untimely filed the prerequisite administrative charge of discrimination, and the circumstances he alleged did not warrant equitable tolling or estoppel. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, then United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, now United States Circuit Judge.


Summaries of

Snowden v. Eater

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 5, 2007
214 F. App'x 624 (8th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Snowden v. Eater

Case Details

Full title:Samuel SNOWDEN, Appellant, v. Poulan/Weed EATER, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 5, 2007

Citations

214 F. App'x 624 (8th Cir. 2007)