Snowden v. Bracy

Full title: William Snowden, Jr., Petitioner, v. Charmaine Bracy, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 19, 2019

Case No.: 4:17CV208 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 19, 2019)

Opinion

Case No.: 4:17CV208

07-19-2019

William Snowden, Jr., Petitioner, v. Charmaine Bracy, Respondent.

James G. Carr Sr. U.S. District Judge

JUDGMENT ENTRY

In accordance with the order filed contemporaneously with the Judgment, It is hereby,

ORDERED THAT:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc 20) be, and the same hereby is adopted as supplemented herein;

2. Petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc. 21) be, and the same hereby are overruled;

3. The petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 1) be, and the same hereby is denied and dismissed, with prejudice; and

4. Petitioner's motion to apply "legal innocence" standard (Doc. 23) be, and the same hereby is denied.

Jurists of reasons could not reasonably dispute the result reached herein or its rationale. I decline, therefore, to issue a Certificate of Appealability.

So ordered.

/s/ James G. Carr

Sr. U.S. District Judge