From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snowden v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 20, 2019
No. 18-2350 (4th Cir. Feb. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-2350

02-20-2019

PAMELA SNOWDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant - Appellee.

Pamela Snowden, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-cv-01849-JKB) Before AGEE, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela Snowden, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pamela Snowden appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Snowden v. Berryhill, No. 1:18-cv-01849-JKB (D. Md. filed Oct. 26, 2018 & entered Oct. 29, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Snowden v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 20, 2019
No. 18-2350 (4th Cir. Feb. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Snowden v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA SNOWDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 20, 2019

Citations

No. 18-2350 (4th Cir. Feb. 20, 2019)