From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snow v. Stayner

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 21, 2013
NO. 09-12-00481-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 09-12-00481-CV

02-21-2013

DONALD SNOW AND JOANN SNOW, Appellants v. RICK STAYNER D/B/A R & R CONSTRUCTION MARINE SERVICES, Appellee


On Appeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-12-13445 CV


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 24, 2013, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellants explained why additional time was needed to file the record. We also notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellants remitted the filing fee for the appeal. The appellants did not respond to the Court's notices. The appellants did not file an affidavit of indigence and are not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, and there being no reasonable explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_______________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.


Summaries of

Snow v. Stayner

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 21, 2013
NO. 09-12-00481-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Snow v. Stayner

Case Details

Full title:DONALD SNOW AND JOANN SNOW, Appellants v. RICK STAYNER D/B/A R & R…

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

NO. 09-12-00481-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 21, 2013)