From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snow v. ADT, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 6, 2020
Case No: 5:19-cv-00021-JGB-SHKx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2020)

Opinion

Case No: 5:19-cv-00021-JGB-SHKx

07-06-2020

JOHN SNOW, Plaintiff, v. ADT, LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive. Defendants.

SEMNAR & HARTMAN, LLP Babak Semnar, Esq. (SBN 224890) Jared M. Hartman, Esq. (SBN 254860) 41707 Winchester Rd. Suite 201 Temecula, California 92590 Telephone: (951) 293-4187 Facsimile: (888) 819-8230 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN SNOW LONNIE D. GIAMELA, SBN 228435 lgiamela@fisherphillips.com SUZY E. LEE, SBN 271120 slee@fisherphillips.com FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 444 South Flower Street, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 330-4500 Facsimile: (213) 330-4501 Attorneys for Defendant ADT, LLC


SEMNAR & HARTMAN, LLP
Babak Semnar, Esq. (SBN 224890)
Jared M. Hartman, Esq. (SBN 254860)
41707 Winchester Rd. Suite 201
Temecula, California 92590
Telephone: (951) 293-4187
Facsimile: (888) 819-8230 Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN SNOW LONNIE D. GIAMELA, SBN 228435
lgiamela@fisherphillips.com
SUZY E. LEE, SBN 271120
slee@fisherphillips.com
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
444 South Flower Street, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 330-4500
Facsimile: (213) 330-4501 Attorneys for Defendant
ADT, LLC

JUDGMENT

Hon. Jesus G. Bernal, Courtroom 1 Complaint Filed: January 4, 2019
Trial Date: Vacated JUDGMENT

This matter having come before the Court on the Parties' Joint Stipulation and Request for Approval of Settlement of Claims and Dismissing Action With Prejudice ("Stipulation of Settlement"), and determining that the Settlement is fair, adequate, reasonable, and otherwise being fully informed and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

1. Judgment is entered in accordance with, and incorporates by reference, the Court's Order Granting the Joint Stipulation and Request for Approval of Settlement of Claims and Dismissing Action With Prejudice ("Order Granting Settlement Approval"). Unless otherwise provided herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Order Granting Settlement Approval and any documents referenced therein. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this lawsuit and all matters relating thereto, and over all Parties to the lawsuit.

2. The Court finds that the Settlement has been reached as a result of serious and non-collusive, arm's-length negotiations. The Court has considered the nature of the claims, the amounts to be paid in settlement, the allocation of settlement proceeds among the Aggrieved Employees and the fact that a settlement represents a compromise of the Parties' respective positions rather than the result of a finding of liability at trial. The Court hereby finds the Settlement involves the resolution of a bona fide dispute, was entered into in good faith, and is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court therefore approves the Settlement as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement and directs the Parties to effectuate the Settlement according to the terms outlined in the Stipulation of Settlement.

3. As of the date of this Judgment, the Plaintiff and Aggrieved Employees shall be bound by the Settlement and Release Agreement referenced in the Stipulation of Settlement. Except as to such rights or claims that may be created by the Settlement, Plaintiff and all Aggrieved Employees fully release any and all claims for penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (hereinafter, "PAGA") that were asserted in the Action or that could have been asserted based on the facts alleged in the action, from October 17, 2017 through the date of Judgment.

4. Defendant shall not be required to pay any additional amounts in connection with the Settlement other than those amounts specifically set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement however, pursuant to the Settlement, Defendant shall pay the costs of Settlement Administration separately and in addition to the Total Settlement Amount.

5. The terms of the Settlement, the Stipulation of Settlement, Order Granting Settlement Approval, and Judgment are binding on the Plaintiff and the Aggrieved Employees, as well as their heirs, executors and administrators, successors, and assigns, and those terms shall have res judicata and other preclusive effect in all pending and future claims, lawsuits or other proceedings maintained by or on behalf of any such persons, to the extent those claims, lawsuits or other proceedings constitute PAGA Released Claims as set forth in the Settlement.

6. Neither this Judgment nor the Settlement (nor any other document referenced herein, nor any action taken to carry out any of the document referenced herein) is, may be construed as, or may be used as, an admission or concession by or against Defendant or the Released Parties of the validity of any claim or actual or potential fault, wrongdoing or liability. Entering into or carrying out the Settlement, and any negotiations or proceedings relate to it, shall not be construed as, or deemed evidence of, an admission or concession as to Defendant's denials or defenses and shall not be offered or received in evidence in any action or proceeding against any party hereto in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal for any purpose whatsoever, except as evidence of the settlement or to enforce the provisions of this Judgment and the Settlement; provided, however, that this Judgment and the Settlement Agreement (or any other document referenced herein) may be filed in any action against or by Defendant or the Released Parties to support a defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, waiver, good-faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, full faith and credit, or any other theory of claim preclusion, issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.

7. This Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

8. Without affecting the finality of the Judgment, the Court reserves exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over this Action for the purposes of supervising the implementation, enforcement, construction, administration, and interpretation of the Settlement and this Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED. Dated: July 6, 2020

/s/_________

Hon. Jesus G. Bernal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Snow v. ADT, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 6, 2020
Case No: 5:19-cv-00021-JGB-SHKx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Snow v. ADT, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SNOW, Plaintiff, v. ADT, LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 6, 2020

Citations

Case No: 5:19-cv-00021-JGB-SHKx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2020)