From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snow Mountain Holdings Trust v. Wray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 20, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00221-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 20, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-cv-00221-PAB-CBS

07-20-2015

SNOW MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS TRUST, Plaintiff, v. GINGER L. WRAY and JOHN KOSKINEN, Defendants


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer filed on June 19, 2015 [Docket No. 13]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on June 19, 2015. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

This standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). --------

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 13] is ACCEPTED.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order, the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, failure to respond to the Court's April 30, 2015 Order to Show Cause, failure to timely serve the defendants, and failure to prosecute.

DATED July 20, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Snow Mountain Holdings Trust v. Wray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 20, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00221-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Snow Mountain Holdings Trust v. Wray

Case Details

Full title:SNOW MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS TRUST, Plaintiff, v. GINGER L. WRAY and JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 20, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-cv-00221-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 20, 2015)